Main Article Content
Abstract
Artikel ini mengkaji mengenai penataan kembali hukum agraria setelah perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, termasuk konsep modernisasinya. Dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan normatif hukum, teridentifikasi sejumlah permasalahan dalam tata kelola agraria, antara lain: disparitas kepemilikan lahan negara, inkonsistensi kebijakan alokasi lahan di masa lampau, munculnya persoalan sosial dan lingkungan di area perdesaan, serta tidak efektifnya Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA). Oleh karena itu, guna menanggulangi persoalan-persoalan ini, pemerintah perlu mengambil langkah-langkah strategis dalam memodernisasi hukum agraria yang berlaku. Pancasila dan konstitusi semestinya menjadi landasan utama dalam pembaruan hukum agraria nasional, agar tanah dan sumber daya agraria tidak lagi diperlakukan sebagai komoditas perdagangan.
This article discusses the reconstruction of agrarian law after the amendments to the 1945 Constitution, as well as the concept of renewal. Through the legal norms approach, several problems were found in managing agrarian affairs, including: inequality in state land control, overlapping land distribution policies in the past, the emergence of social and ecological crises in rural areas and the non-functioning of UUPA. So to overcome this problem, the Government needs to take strategic steps to reform the existing agrarian law. Pancasila and the constitution must be the spirit and soul of national agrarian law reform. So that existing land and agrarian resources will no longer be used as trading material.
Keywords
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
References
- Handoko, Widhi, 2014. Kebijakan Hukum Pertanahan Sebuah Refleksi Keadilan Hukum Progresif, Yogyakarta: Thafa Media.
- Handoko, Widhi, 2019. Kebijakan Hukum Pertanahan Sebuah Refleksi Keadilan Hukum Progresif, Yogyakarta: Thafa Media.
- Harsono, Boedi, 1997. Hukum Agraria Indonesia, Sejarah Pembentukan UndangUndang Pokok Agraria, Isi, dan Pelaksanaannya, Vol. II, Jakar.
- Harsono, Boedi, 2018. Hukum Agraria Indonesia, Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi, dan Pelaksanaannya, Vol. II, Jakarta: Djambatan.
- Kamus Bahasa Indonesia, 1991. Vol II Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
- Muchsin DKK, 2017. Hukum Agraria Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Sejarah, Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.
- Santoso, Urip. 2019. Hukum Agraria, Kajian Komprehensif, vol. 2, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2017. Hukum Agraria & Hak -hak Atas Tanah, Jakarta: PT Fajar Interpratama Offset.
- Sidharta, 2019. Ilmu Hukum Indonesia, Bandung, FH Unika Parahyangan.
- Soeprapto, 1986. Undang-Undang pokok Agraria dalam peraktek, (Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia perss.
- Supriadi, 2012. Hukum Agraria, Vol 5. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
- Ulum, K. M., & Ulum, M. K. (2023). Screening Standards in Sharia Capital Market Investor Legal Protection. El-Mashlahah, 13(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mashlahah.v13i1.5791