Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 131 Download : 90

Main Article Content

Abstract

هدفت هذه الدراسة إلى معرفة الأمر في اللغة العربية ونظيرها في اللغة الإندونيسية لاكتشاف أوجه التشابه والاختلاف بينهما من الناحية الصرفية والنحوية والدلالية، ثم إعداد المادة الدراسية لتعليم الأمر في اللغة العربية بناء على نتائج الدراسة. والمنهج الذي استخدمته الباحثة في هذه الدراسة هو المنهج الوصفي التحليلي للوقوف على خصائص الأمر في اللغتين، والمنهج التحليل التقابلي لمقارنة نظام الأمر في اللغتين واستنباط ما فيهما من أوجه التشابة والاختلاف. وقد توصلت هذه الدراسة إلى ثلاث نتائج، هي : 1) وجود 15 وجه التشابه بين الأمر في اللغتين منها: أن فعل الأمر فيهما من الأفعال اللازمة والمتعدية، ووجود 37 وجه الاختلاف منها: نيابة المصدر عن فعل الأمر في العربية وعدمها في الإندونيسية. 2) الصعوبات المتوقع حدوثها نتيجة الاختلاف بين اللغتين، 3) الاستفادة من نتائج الدراسة في إعداد المادة الدراسية لتعليم الأمر في اللغة العربية للمتعلمين الإندونيسيين بوضعها في نصوص الحوار والقراءة والوحدات التعليمية.


This study aimed to know the imperative sentence in Arabic and its counterpart in Indonesian language, to discover its similarities and differences from the morphological, grammatical and semantic aspects, then prepare some learning materials to teach it based on the results of the study. The method used in this study is the descriptive analytical approach to determine the properties of the imperative sentences between the two languages, and the cross-analytical approach to compare the rules of both languages, and to infer the similarities and differences between them. This study has reached three results, they are: 1) 15 similarities of the imperative sentence in the two languages, including: imperative verbs between them is formed from intransitive and transitive verbs, and there were also 37 differences, including: the use in masdar (verbal noun) as an imperative word in Arabic, and lack of it in Indonesian. 2) The difficulties may occur as a result of the difference between both languages, 3) Applying the results of the study in preparing learning materials to teach the imperative sentences in Arabic to Indonesian learners by placing them in the texts of dialogue, reading and units.

Keywords

Contrastive Study Imperative Teaching Arabic as a second language

Article Details

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Ahmar, M.A. 2001. Al-Taqdîm Wa Al-Ta’khîr Baina Al-Nahwu Wa Al-Sharf. Bairut: Muassasah Al-Risâlah
  2. Al-Basyîr, Ahmad Bin Abdullâh. 1988. At-Tahlîl Al-Taqâbuli Baina Al-Nazariyyah Wa Al-Tatbîq Al-Muwajjah Fî Ta’lîm Al-Lughah Al-‘Arabiyyah Li Ghairi Al-Nâthiqîna Bihâ. Jakarta: Ma’had Al-‘Ulûm Al-Islâmiyyah Wa Al-‘Arabiyyah Bi Indonesia
  3. Al-Galâyainî, M. 1993. Jâmi’ Ad-Durûs Al-‘Arabiah. Beirût: Mansyûrât Al-Maktabah Al-‘Ashriyah.
  4. Al-Tsaury, S. 2016. Al-Kalimât Zâtu Aslin ‘Arabiy FÎ Qâmûs Al-Lughah Al-Indûnîsiyyah Al-Kabîr (Dirâsah Washfiyyah Tahlîliyyah). Sukabumi: STIBA Arraayah
  5. Alwi, H., dkk. 2010. Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Pusat Bahasa Dan Balai Pustaka.
  6. Brown, H.D. 2007. Teaching By Priciples. San Fransisco: Pearson Education.
  7. Duwaidri, R.W. 2000. Al-Bahtsu Al-‘Ilmi, Asâsiyyâtuhu An-Nadzoriyyah Wa Mumârosatuhu Al-‘Ilmiyyah. Damaskus: Daar Al-Fikr.
  8. Hasan, A. 1398 H. Al-Nahwu Al-Wâfî. Kairo: Dâr Al-Ma’ârif
  9. Ibnu Ibrahim, Rustam. Al-Amru Baina Al-Lughah Al-‘Arabiyyah Wa Al-Lughah Al-Indûnîsiyyah Dirâsah Fî Al-Tahlîl Al-Taqâbulî. Madinah: Al-Jâmi’ah Al-Imâm Muhammad Bin Sa’ûd Al-Islâmiyyah
  10. Ibnu Jinni, Abû Al-Fath Utsmân. 1952. Al-Khasâis. Bairut: Dâr Al-Lughah.
  11. Karim, N.S, Dkk. 1993. Tatabahasa Dewan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka.
  12. Khalf, N. 2018. Khâsâis Al-Lughah, Diakses pada 12 Maret 2020, https://mawdoo3.com/ خصائص اللغة
  13. Nur, T. 2014. Sumbangan Bahasa Arab Terhadap Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Pengembangan Bahasa Dan Budaya. Jurnal Humaniora. Universitas Padjajaran. Vol: 26.
  14. Ridho, F. 2018. Tariqah Ta‘Lim Al-Lugah Al-‘Arabiyah ‘Ala Manhaj Silsilah Al-‘Arabiyah Fi Jami‘Ah Ar-Raayah Sukabumi. Sukabumi: STIBA Arraayah
  15. Shâlih, S. 1980. Dirâsah Fî Fiqh Al-Lughah. Beirut: Dâr Al-‘Ilm Al-Malâyîn.
  16. Suryanegara, A.M. 2015. Api Sejarah. Bandung: Surya Dinasti.