Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 382 Download : 743

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Dialogue is a method of learning that involves students to be active, both cognitive, affective, and psychomotoric. But in practice dialogue sometimes leads to conflicting attitudes and provoking emotions. This study is aimed to explore dialogue concept of Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi in his book Adab Hiwar fi al-Islam and the implementation of the dialogue concept into active learning at school. The finding showed that there are eleven rules of dialogue concept which according to Muhammad Sayyid Tantawi, namely: (1) Honesty, (2) Focus on the themes discussed, (3) Presenting an accurate proposition and sound logic (4) Clarify the location of differences in a concrete and correct manner according to the discussion (5) Ethics of politeness, avoiding actions that are not appropriate to do, (6) Lead to the public interest, (7) Prioritize the opinions of expert experts, (8) Do not generalize the law, (9) Reviewing the principles of benefits and their disadvantages, (10) Upgrading the understanding and accuracy of the law agreed upon by the experts (11) Being open and candid, by promoting the truth.

Keywords

Active learning Civilized dialogue Islamic Teaching Values

Article Details

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Al-Baqi, A & Muhammad Fu’ad. (1996). Mu’jam al-Mufahras li al-Fazi alQur’a al-Karim, Dar al al-Fikr, Al-Qahirah.
  2. Al-Attas. (1997). Aim and Objectives os Islamic Education, Jeddah: King Abdul Aziz University.
  3. Al-Attas. (1997). Muhammad Naquib. Islam dan Sekularisme, Bandung: Pustaka, 1981.
  4. Al-Jaziri, M. An-Nihayah fi gharibi al-Hadis wa al-Atsar, Ibn Atsir, 554-606 H, vol.1.
  5. Al-Mishri, Muhammad ibn Mukarrim ibn Manzur al-Ansari al-Ifriqi, ‘Amir Ahmad Haidar dan ‘Abd al-Mun’im Khalil Ibrahim. (2009). Lisan al-‘Arab, ed’. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
  6. Al-‘Uwaidah, Salman ibn Fahd. (1991). Dawabit li al-Dirasat al-Fiqhiyyah, Riyyadh: Dar al-Watan.
  7. Alwasilah, A. Chaedar. (2012). Pokoknya Kualititatif: Dasar-dasar Merancang dan Melakukan Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: PT Dunia Pustaka Jaya dan Pustaka jaya Jakarta.
  8. Amri, Sofian. (2015). Implementasi Pembelajaran aktif dalam Kurikulum 2013, Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Jakarta.
  9. Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
  10. Azra, Azyumardi. (2012). Pendidikan Islam: Tradisi dan Modernisasi di Tengah Tantangan Milenium III, Jakarta: Kencana.
  11. Az Zubaidi, Imam Ahmad ibn Abdil. (1994). Mukhtar Shahih Bukhari, Beirut: Darrul Kutub.
  12. Bungin, Burhan. (2003). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
  13. Dalman. (2014). Keterampilan Membaca, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  14. Depertemen Bahasa ‘Arab. (2005). Mu’jam al-Wasit, Jumhuriyyah al-Misriyyah: Maktabah al-Syaruq ad-Dauliyyah.
  15. Departemen Pedidikan Nasional. (2012). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Pusat Bahasa: Edisi Keemat, Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  16. Dimyati & Mudjiono. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
  17. Dweck, Carol S. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology press.
  18. Gall, Meredith Damien, Joyce P. Gall dan Walter R.Borg. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction, Boston: Pearson Education Inc.
  19. Hefni, Harjni. (2015). Komunikasi Islam, Jakarta: Kencana.
  20. Humaid, Ibn, et.al, Mausu’ah Nadrah al-Na’im fi Makarim akhlaq al-Rasul al-Karim, vol.2.
  21. Ibn Mandhūr, M. (1988). Lisan al-arab. Juz V, Beirut: Dar Al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah.
  22. Kemenristek Dikti. Bentuk dan Metode Pembelajaran Abad 21.
  23. Kesuma, Triatna, & Permana. (2011). Pendidikan Karakter : Kajian Teori dan Praktik di Sekolah, hlm.24; dan Sauri, Filsafat dan Teosofat Akhlak.
  24. Kridalaksana, Harimurti. (1985). Tata bahasa deskriptif bahasa Indonesia: Sintaksis. Vol. 85. Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
  25. Moleong, Lexy J. (2013). "Metode penelitian kualitatif (Revisi)." Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
  26. Ma’luf, Louis. (1986). al-Munjid fi al-Lughah wal-A'lam, Beirut: Dâr al-Masyriq.
  27. Maqbul, Ali Muhammad. (2008). Manahij al-Bahst al-‘ilmi wa tahqiq al-turats, Alexandria: Dar al-iman dan Dar al-Quds Shan’a.
  28. McKeachie, W. W. (1986). Teaching Tips: A Guidebook for the Beginning College Teacher. Boston: D.C.Health.
  29. Munawwir, A.W. (2007). Kamus Al-Munawwir Indonesia Dan Arab, Surabaya: Pustaka Progressif.
  30. McKeachie, W. W. (1986). Teaching Tips: A Guidebook for the Beginning College Teacher. Boston: D.C.Health.
  31. McKeachie, W. W. (1986). Teaching Tips: A Guidebook for the Beginning College Teacher. Boston: D.C.Health.
  32. Nazir, Moh. (2011). Metode Penelitian, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
  33. Pollio, H.R. (1984). What Student Think abaut and Do in College Lecture Classes, dalam Teaching Learning issues No.53, Knoxville: Learning Research Centre, University of Tennesse.
  34. Ramayulis. (2002). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam, Jakarta: Kalam Mulia.
  35. Rosyada, Dede. (2004). Paradigma Pendidikan Demokratis: Sebuah Model Pelibatan Masyarakat Dalam Menyelenggarakan Pendidikan, Jakarta: Prenada Media.
  36. Rusman. (2006). Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu, Jakarta: Rajawali Press, Cet.2.
  37. Santrock, John W., and John W. Santrock. (2007). "Psikologi Pendidikan edisi kedua."
  38. Sauri, S., & Tafsir, A. (2011). Filsafat dan Teosofat Akhlak.
  39. Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D, Bandung: Alfabeta.
  40. Sulastini, Rita. (2018). "Reposisi Filosofi Pendidikan Dalam Proses Pembelajaran." INSANIA: Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan 23, no. 1.
  41. Syafi’I, Imam. (1999). Pengajaran Membaca Terpadu. Bahan Kursus Pendalaman Materi Guru Inti PKG Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. Malang: IKIP.
  42. Tafsir, Ahmad. (2014). Filsafat Pendidikan Islami, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, Cet.6.
  43. Tafsir, Ahmad. (1991). Ilmu Pendidikan Dalam Perspektif Islam, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  44. Winkel, W. S. (1987). Psikologi Pengajaran, Jakarta: Gramedia.
  45. Yaumi, Muhammad. (2013). Prisip-Prinsip Desain Pembelajaran,Jakarta: Kencana.
  46. http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/learning/active.html diakses pada tanggal: 08 maret 2020.