Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 67 Download : 82

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Pernikahan merupakan sebuah ikatan antara dua jenis kelamin yang berbeda yaitu laki-laki dan perempuan yang sebelumnya diharamkan dan bertujuan untuk membangun rumah tangga dan menempuh hidup yang lebih baik menjadi pasangan suami istri. Namun dalam kehidupan sebuah pasangan pasti ada cobaan atau permasalahan sehingga terjadi perselisihan. Salah satu alasan menarik untuk dibahas yaitu gugatan cerai seorang istri terhadap suaminya yang mengalami gangguan jiwa sehingga suami tidak bisa menunaikan hak-haknya. Penelitian ini membahas tentang pandangan maqoshid syari’ah dalam putusan hakim pengadilan agama pekalongan No.0078/pdt.G/2015/PA.PKL terkait gugatan cerai suami gila. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian telaah pustaka yang bersifat kualitatif yang datanya diperoleh dari bedah pustaka yang berkaitan dengan pembahasan. Hasil dari penelitian ini pandangan maqoshid syariah terkait putusan hakim PA pekalongan No. .0078/pdt.G/2015/PA.PKL belum sesuai, karena melihat dari maslahat yang akan terjadi apabila dikabulkan gugatan cerainya. Dalam berita acara perkara ini istri sudah terpenuhi alasan untuk bercerai, dan di dalamnya istri sering mengalami gangguan. Mereka juga sudah tidak tinggal bersama lagi sejak istri mengandung anak pertamanya. sehingga suami tidak bisa menunaikan hak-haknya, dan memenuhi kebutuhan keluarganya.


Marriage is a bond between two different sexes namely a man and a woman which was previously forbidden and aims to build a household and lead a better life as a married couple. But in the life of a couple there must be trials or problems so that disputes occur. One interesting reason to discuss is a wife's divorce lawsuit against her husband who has a mental disorder so that the husband cannot fulfill his rights. This study discusses the views of maqoshid shari'ah in the decision of the judge of the Pekalongan Religious Court No.0078 / pdt. G/2015/PA. PKL related to the divorce lawsuit of a crazy husband. This research is a type of qualitative literature review research whose data is obtained from literature review related to the discussion. The results of this study are the views of maqoshid shari'ah related to the decision of the PA judge pekalongan No. . 0078/pdt. G/2015/PA. PKL is not yet appropriate, because it sees from the benefits that will occur if the divorce lawsuit is granted. In the minutes of this case the wife has fulfilled the reason for divorce, and in it the wife often experiences interference. They have also not lived together since his wife became pregnant with his first child. So that the husband cannot fulfill his rights, and provide for his family.

Keywords

Cerai Gugat Gila Maqoshid Syariah Crazy Divorce Lawsuit Maqoshid Shari'ah

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Abdur Rosyid, Http://Www.Menaraislam.Com/Ushul-Fiqih/Macam-Macam-Maqashid-Syariah#:~:Text=Adapun%20hajiyatadalah%20segala%20sesuatu%20yang%20jika%20tidak%20terpenuhi,Tidak%20terpenuhi%2C%20tetapi%20hanya%20menyebabkan%20kesempitan%20dan%20kesulitan, Di Akses Pada Tanggal 7 Juli 2023 Puku 16:24 WIB.
  2. Al-Bukhari, Abu Abdillah Muhammad Ibn Ismail, Shahih Bukhari, (Damaskus,Daar Ibn-Katsir, 1993), Jilid.5, Hal.1950, No.4778.
  3. Al-Ghazali, Imam Abi Hamid Muhammad Bin Muhammad, Al-Mustashfa Min ‘Ilm Al-Ushul, (Beirut, Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah, 1983), Juz .I, Hal. 286-287.
  4. Al-Jauziyah, Ibn Qayyim, I’lam Al-Muwaqqi’in, (Beirut: Dar Al-Kutub Al-Ilmiyyah,1996), Jilid 3, Hal,37.
  5. Al-Nasa’I, Abu Abdurrahman Ahmad Ibn Syuaib, Sunan An-Nasa’i,(Al-Maktabah, At-Tijariyah Al-Kubra, Kairo 1930), Jilid.6, Hal.65, No.3227.
  6. Al-Qozwayni, Abu Abdillah Muhammad Ibn Yazid Ibn Majah, Sunan Ibn Majah, (Dar Ar-Risalah Al-Alamiyah 2009), Jilid.3, Hal.198, No.2041.
  7. Al-Qur’an Al-Karim
  8. Al-Sa’di, Abdurrahman Ibn Naasir Ibn Abdillah As-Sa’di, Taisir Al-Karim Ar-Arahman Fi Tafsiri Kalaami Al-Mannaan, (Muassasah Ar-Risalah,2000 M), Jilid.1, Hal.648.
  9. Al-Syaibani, Ahmad Ibn Muhammad Ibn Hanbal Ibn Hilal, Musnad Al-Imam Ibn Hanbal, (Muassasah Ar-Risalah,2001), Jilid .8, Hal.83, No.4495.
  10. Al-Syathbi, Abu Ishaq Ibrahim Ibn Musa Ibn Muhammad Al-Lakhomi, Al-Muwafaqaat, (Cet.I, Daar Ibn Affan 1997 M), Jilid.3, Hal.237.
  11. Al-Tirmizi, Muhammad Ibn Isa Ibn Musa As-Sulami, Sunan At-Tirmizi, (Mesir , Musthofa Al-Baabi Al-Halabi, 1975), Jilid.3, Hal.618, No.1341.
  12. Ante, Susanti, Pembuktian Dan Putusan Pengadilan Dalam Acara Pidana, Lex Crimen Vol.Ii, 2013, Hal 98.
  13. Auda, Jasser, Fiqh Al- Maqāṣid Ināṭat Al-Ahkām Bi Maqāṣidihā, (Herndon: IIIT, 2007), H. 15.
  14. Bakri, Asafri Jaya,Konsep Maqāṣid Al-Syarī‟Ah Menurut Al-Shatibi, (Jakarta: Pt. Raja Grafindo Persada, 1996), H. 61.
  15. Basyar, Achmad Beadie Busyroel, Perlindungan Nasab Dalam Teori Maqashid Syariah, (Maqoshid 2020), Vol.III, Hal.4.
  16. Basyir, Ahmad Azhar, Hukum Perkawinan Islam, (Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2004), Hal.81.
  17. Fajar ND, Mukti, Yulianto Achmad, 2010, Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif & Empiris, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, Hal.34.
  18. Ibnu Rusyd, Abu Walid, Bidayah Al-Mujtahid Wa Nihayah Al-Muqtashid, (Beirut, Dar Ibn Hazm), Hal.438.
  19. Imam Mawardi, Ahmad, Fiqh Minoritas Fiqh Aqalliyât Dan Evolusi Maqāṣid Al- Syarīah Dari Konsep Ke Pendekatan, (Yogyakarta: Lkis, 2010), H. 178-179.
  20. Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) Pasal 115, Tentang Putusnya Perkawinan Bab XVI Bagian Satu.
  21. Mahfudh, Sahal, Nuansa Fikih Sosial (Yogyakarta: LKIS, 1994), Hlm.22.
  22. Pengadilan Agama Pekalongan, Salinan Putusan No. 0078/Pdt.G/2015/PA.Pkl
  23. Rusli, Muhammad, Hukum Acara Pidana Kontemporer,( Bandung, Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007) Hal. 199.
  24. Sahrani , Sohari, Fikih Munakahat:Kajian Fikih Nikah Lengkap,(Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2009), H. 229.
  25. Undang Undang Republik Indonesia No 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Perkawinan Pasal 38.